Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wai Chun Tam
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Wai Chun Tam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Local politicians are not inherently notable without other substantial coverage. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 02:36, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Subject is a district councillor without any other great claims to notability. fails to meet WP:POLITICIAN. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 02:37, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni↑talk↓ 03:12, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - a quick search says not notable. Kayau Voting IS evil 16:21, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.