Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerissa Fare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 2000. No opposition to a redirect but apparently no reason to keep the history. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:04, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Kerissa Fare

Kerissa Fare (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet either WP:BASIC or WP:PORNBIO criteria; no in-depth coverage found, only a brief appearance in the news for being a witness at a murder trial, along with the resulting sensationalistic "true crime" coverage. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 09:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

• Delete -- does not meet WP:NMODEL & significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:00, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 13:44, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete as per above.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
• Strong delete This is a biogrpahy of a living person that has zero, and I mean 0, reliable sources. It should not be allowed to stand at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:42, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete does not pass WP:GNG, best left to Playboy wikia Atlantic306 (talk) 18:48, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 2000, per well-established consensus practice. This should have been done directly; there was no need to bring this to AFD. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 10:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Speaking of articles that lack reliable sources – since when is weeklypigs.com considered reliable for biographical info? —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 12:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
    • That point was raised before, and the consensus (which I'm not fond of, and didn't support) was that the source accurately repeated the information given in the magazine itself. If I remember right, somebody even spot-checked it. It's like IMDB -- generally not acceptable as a source, but accepted for noncontroversial replication of information published elsewhere, like standard cast lists, but hard to find stable online citations for. (It also prevented people from linking to copyvio pages hosting centerfold and "Playmate Data Sheet" pages). If you want to change the cites to the actual magazine pages, be my guest -- I have better things to do. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 14:31, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.